Visitors
var _clustrmaps = {'url' : 'http://michelleshayes.edublogs.org/', 'user' : 1047617, 'server' : '4', 'id' : 'clustrmaps-widget', 'version' : 1, 'date' : '2012-09-29', 'lang' : 'en', 'corners' : 'square' };(function (){ var s = document.createElement('script'); s.type = 'text/javascript'; s.async = true; s.src = 'http://www4.clustrmaps.com/counter/map.js'; var x = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; x.parentNode.insertBefore(s, x);})();
!function(d,s,id){var js,fjs=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],p=/^http:/.test(d.location)?'http':'https';if(!d.getElementById(id)){js=d.createElement(s);js.id=id;js.src=p+"://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js";fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js,fjs);}}(document,"script","twitter-wjs");
Google Language Translator
function googleTranslateElementInit() {
new google.translate.TranslateElement({pageLanguage: 'en', layout: google.translate.TranslateElement.InlineLayout.SIMPLE}, 'google_translate_element');
}
My response to the quote is that I do not agree because it was made for us to speak our mind. I don’t see how it could be dangerous. The only way I see is if as dangerous is if people don’t accepted the way we are and that they don’t want us to be successful.
Based upon our class conversation, I believed you clarified your understanding and your perception, Miracle. Let me know.
I appereciate your quick response.
i dont agree because we need toe be able to speak mind and be able to read the books we want to read and not get our books taking by teaches. this is a discrace. We DEMAND the freedom to read own
book. Thats my comment
I am wondering if you can revise this, so that it demonstrates what you know about words and sentences. What do you think?
I agree with this ,because if people are not able to write about what they want so people are basically writing about the same thing
What makes restricting another’s thoughts and speech “dangerous” and “subversive”?